Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Texas: Division issues notices on impairment ratings, quality review

The Division of Workers' Compensation issued a memorandum reminding doctors who certify maximum medical improvement and assign an impairment rating of the requirement to provide notice to injured employees of their ability to dispute the determination of MMI and the assignment of an impairment rating by a treating or referral doctor.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

The requirement applies to treating doctors, referral doctors in the event a treating doctor is not authorized to do so, and certifying doctors. The notice must be provided with the report of medical evaluation, and it must be provided in English, Spanish, or any other language common to the injured employee. The notice must provide a statement that the assigned impairment rating may become final if not disputed within 90 days, and if the injured employee, or the injured employee's representative, disagrees with the certification, they may dispute the certification by contacting the division and requesting a benefit review conference.

The Division of Workers' Compensation also issued a memorandum outlining revisions to the medical quality review procedure, which went into effect on Jan. 1. The changes include a reduction of the number of members on the quality assurance committee panel from five to three. Additionally, quarterly audits of selected medical quality reviews are now required. The complaint process was clarified to ensure that only written, non-anonymous complaints will be accepted.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

February 14, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.