Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Rhode Island: Regulators ponder diverging rate proposals

The Department of Business Regulation is deciding whether to increase or decrease advisory loss costs. NCCI had proposed an overall 3.9 percent increase while the attorney general is seeking an overall 0.6 percent decrease.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Attorney General Peter F. Kilmartin said a thorough analysis and independent actuarial study led to his determination that NCCI's proposal was too high. Specifically, he objected to:

  • NCCI's selected medical trend factor. Kilmartin said NCCI did not use the analytically determined factor he recommended.
  • The allowance for loss adjustment expense. Kilmartin said it did not take into account historical results.
  • What he termed an "inappropriate factor to adjust limited losses to an unlimited basis which is wholly unsupported by historical data."

The Department of Business Regulation is reviewing public comments on the proposals and expects to have a decision soon.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

March 24, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.