Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Drill down in data for differentiation

One of the most important things workers' comp participants interested in getting the full benefit of predictive modeling can do is case mix adjustment, said Dr. Laura B. Gardner, president and founder of California-based Axiomedics Research Inc.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

"It takes data analysis one step beyond looking descriptively and allows you to establish a relationship between predictive variables and outcome variables that adjust for differences among the claims."

Gardner says if you are trying to compare medical providers, it allows you to adjust for those providers that have more difficult caseloads. "If you didn't take that into account, you'd be doing providers a disservice because you'd be saying 'we expect your outcomes to be the same as those over here," she said. "That wouldn't be fair. So what this does is level the playing field and allows you to compare apples to apples."

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

April 25, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.