Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Sensing the Different Feel in the Property Insurance Market

Risk managers will find a different insurance market when they buy property coverage this year. But how will the transition to a hard market progress?

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

By MATTHEW BRODSKY, senior editor/Web editor of Risk & Insurance®

VANCOUVER---The analogy out there for the property market is that the switch has been flipped. Gone is the soft market. All hail the hard market.

Except that reality is not so simplistic, at least according to leading property underwriters who spoke with Risk & Insurance® on-site at the 2011 meeting of the Risk and Insurance Management Society Inc.

Instead, the property insurance market is in transition, and the picture on rates is mixed. Risk managers who perhaps have a history of losses and a deal of catastrophic exposure won't be seeing rate drops or even flat rates--but rate increases. Others who better manage their company's catastrophe exposure might see better rates, but gone are the days of double-digit decreases.

Corporate insurance buyers with large, complex property programs might even be seeing different reactions from the individual carriers in their towers.

Still, as complicated as the picture is, let's try to generalize as much as possible.

Even in the first quarter, said Tony Mammolite, global chief of property for Bermuda-based Ironshore, a surplus-lines player, the property market was seeing "rate declines starting to decline." Ironshore in particular has seen no rate declines and better than flat rates.

"We're satisfied with the progression we've seen so far," Mammolite said, adding that it would be best for the transition to a hard market to be steady. A rate spike, he said, wouldn't be good for anyone and wouldn't be sustainable.

Jon Hall, executive vice president at FM Global, the property insurance specialist, is seeing a flat market overall out there at the moment. From his view, the market is not "distressed."

"Good news is, there's a lot of capital," he explained.

Still, capacity in the market will "slowly but surely" contract, he added. Reinsurers appear to be "locking down" for July 1 renewals, though even then he doesn't foresee large rate increases from insurers' insurers.

"Seeing rate reductions by and large for the most part is over," said Mike McCrimmon, senior vice president of international property at Allied World. "Allied World's recent experience in the treaty reinsurance market is that reinsurers have begun to raise prices."

And some primary carriers in this "skittish" market are already reducing exposures.

The trigger was in part Japan, where a March 11 earthquake might have "caught off guard" the insurance industry, he said.

It does not help that the global property insurance industry has been suffering losses seemingly on a weekly basis, starting with Chile last year, then the two New Zealand quakes, the Australian floods, winter storms in the United States and Europe, and most recently the tornadoes in the South and Midwest. The price tag for those tornadoes could be $2 billion to $5 billion, according to modeler Eqecat Inc.

Another factor is the release of the newest U.S. hurricane model from Risk Management Solutions Inc., which pushed up frequency and tail risk for many insurers' books, according to McCrimmon.

Carriers could now need to charge more rate for the capital they allocate, explained Mammolite.

May 3, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.