Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Ohio: Commission seeks to clarify attorney's fees

The Industrial Commission proposed amendments to a rule regarding fee controversies.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

The commission added factors upon which to base attorney's fees, including: 1) the likelihood that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer; 2) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services; 3) the time limitations imposed by the claimant or the circumstances; 4) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the claimant; 5) the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer performing the services; and 6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent. The rule requires the representative to file a copy of the written fee agreement. If the fee agreement is a contingency fee agreement, the commission will inquire as to whether the contingency that is the basis for the matter occurred.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

May 5, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.