Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Employer's failure to file prehearing conference statement proves costly

In New York, the waiver of defenses resulting from the employer's failure to timely file a prehearing conference statement does not create a presumption relieving a worker of his obligation to demonstrate a compensable injury.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Smith v. Albany County Sheriff's Department, et al., 111 NYWCLR 18 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011).

Ruling: The New York Appellate Division held that a correction officer, who alleged he suffered depression and anxiety due to harassment at his workplace, sustained a compensable injury.

What it means: In New York, the waiver of defenses resulting from the employer's failure to timely file a prehearing conference statement does not create a presumption relieving a worker of his obligation to demonstrate a compensable injury.

Summary: The New York Appellate Division agreed with the Workers' Compensation Board's holding that a correction officer, who alleged he suffered depression and anxiety due to workplace harassment, sustained a compensable injury. The employer waived its defenses for failing to file a prehearing conference statement as required. The waiver of defenses resulting from the failure to timely file a prehearing conference statement did not create a presumption relieving the officer of his obligation to demonstrate a compensable injury.

In this case, the medical reports submitted by the officer sufficiently established a claim for work-related stress. Such records detailed the stress that he experienced and attributed it, in part, to rumors spread at work that he had once committed rape, and to threats and harassment from inmates and staff. The records were sufficient to conclude that the stress that caused the injury was greater than that experienced by others working in similar capacities.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

May 9, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.