Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Initial Results Point to a Manufacturing Defect in some Older 737 Passenger Jets

Safety board eyes rivets in plane's skin as the reason for depressurization.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

By CYRIL TUOHY, managing editor of Risk & Insurance®

Initial results of an investigation into a hole in the fuselage of a Southwest Airlines jet over the Arizona desert on April 1 points to defects in the way aluminum plates were fastened, the National Transportation Safety Board said.

The inspection "revealed gaps between the shank portions of several rivets and the corresponding rivet holes for many rivets" in part of the fuselage, the NTSB said in a statement posted on its website April 25.

Aviation insurance brokers will likely take notice of the investigation as they typically arrange the insurance programs for the nation's large airlines.

The NTSB said it is conducting further tests on the rivets, but some independent airline consultants have cast some doubt on the official explanation, according to news reports.

A manufacturing defect would pin the liability on airplane maker Boeing Co., which typically would protect itself with product liability coverage in its insurance program, brokers and risk managers said.

No aircraft was grounded by the Federal Aviation Administration in the days following the incident. The FAA instead ordered extra inspections to early-model 737 aircraft, of which there are about 175 in operation worldwide.

"In this case, the FAA required an increase in the frequency of inspection of certain high-cycle aircraft models," said Charles Cederroth, a long-time Aon aviation broker, in an interview in early April. "So, there is no coverage response from a manufacturer perspective."

Skin fatigue sets in when the passenger cabin goes through thousands of pressurization and depressurization cycles that stem from the takeoffs and landings. The Southwest jet that suffered the damage had logged 39,781 cycles (or 39,781 takeoffs and landings.)

June 1, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.