Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Illinois: Hopes high for reform despite end of legislative session

Gov. Pat Quinn's request for the Legislature to pass workers' comp reform legislation by mid-April did not happen. Still, many were holding out hope that there would be agreement on something before lawmakers went home.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

But with at least one key issue still a bone of contention between the participants, it seemed unlikely there would be consensus on significant reform before the proposed adjournment date of the end of May. A major sticking point: causation.

Many states have established standards for determining that work was a contributing factor in a worker's injury before benefits kick in. While some say work must be the prevailing factor, other states provide coverage to injuries or illnesses where work is the predominant, substantial, or a significant cause of the malady.

Business advocates say some standard is needed in Illinois, especially in light of the recent situation at an Illinois prison. Fewer than 1,000 employees at the Menard Correctional Center had more than 500 workers' comp claims in a three year period, generating benefits of more than $10 million. A federal investigation is under way.

Those opposed to the causation argument say the current language, which says an injury must arise out of or during the course of employment, does not need to be changed.

There is reportedly general agreement on some issues, however. "Reducing the amount doctors charge, the fee schedules. Most sides agree on that, given that Illinois is second behind Alaska in the amount that doctors charge for workers' comp," said attorney Rich Lenkov, a partner with the Chicago firm Bryce Downey & Lenkov. "Others, like making it more difficult for someone who is intoxicated to recover [benefits], seems to be an easy one."

One lawmaker has proposed eliminating the workers' comp system in Illinois and leaving it to the courts to determine coverage for injured workers.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

May 31, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.