Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

New Model Leaves Insurers Black and Blue

The true impact of a new hurricane model was a shock to the property insurance world, or was it?

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

By MATTHEW BRODSKY, senior editor/Web editor of Risk & Insurance®.

We could get into the microcosmic nitty-gritty of Risk Management Solutions' new U.S. hurricane model, such as how it will increase loss estimates more for inland properties.

Or, we could get macrocosmic, like how it will increase the cost of capital for insurers. They will need to buy more reinsurance, reduce their exposure, or pass on costs to insurance buyers through higher rates and deductibles and lower limits. More interesting, right?

Perhaps most interesting is asking whether the insurance world was properly prepared for this. RMS apparently warned the market for a year about the hurricane update before its release on Feb. 28.

Underwriters, however, claim that the guidance RMS gave before and what the model update actually does don't match up. It's the difference between blue and black, said Tony Mammolite, global chief of property for Bermuda-based Ironshore.

Ryan A. Barber, managing director at New York-based Marsh, observed how "shocked" people were by the magnitude of the model's effects, and as a result are looking to introduce additional models into their underwriting.

Yet the market has known for years about the modeling shortfalls that got fixed in RMS 11.0, said Tom Larsen, senior vice president of rival modeling firm Eqecat Inc., and many reinsurers have already adjusted for them.

Reinsurers already closed some of the gap between the old RMS model and the new one if they did diligent loss analyses of past events, said Serge Troeber, chief underwriting officer for Swiss Re Corporate Solutions.

Catastrophe models provide insurers with an estimate of their potential losses for hurricanes and other disasters, which help them price risk and reserve for their exposure.

The Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology approved use of RMS 11.0 in the Sunshine State in early June, and ratings agency A.M. Best went on record around the same time and said it would support use of the new version.

August 1, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.