Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Worker can't claim comp for wipeout on bicycle while avoiding rabbit

In Illinois, where a worker fails to prove that his risk of injury is not any greater than that faced by the general public, his injury is not compensable.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Tillery v. McLean County Nursing Home, 19 ILWCLB 67 (Ill. W.C. Comm. 2011).

Ruling: The Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission held that a worker's injuries, sustained when he fell on his lunch break after leaving the facility to go home but while on the employer's property did not arise out of and in the course of his employment.

What it means: In Illinois, where a worker fails to prove that his risk of injury is not any greater than that faced by the general public, his injury is not compensable.

Summary: A worker at a nursing home checked out for lunch and was heading home. He was leaving the facility on his bike on a paved road when he was startled by a rabbit. He swerved and fell. The worker said that the nursing home was located near a park, and therefore, the necessity of swerving to avoid a rabbit was an occurrence that arose out of his employment.

The arbitrator noted that upon review of pictures of the area, the park was on the opposite side of the building from where he fell. The nursing home building and its parking lot separated the location of the injury from the park. The arbitrator found the worker did not face a greater risk than the general public of injury after being startled by a rabbit. Therefore, the worker failed to prove an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. The Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission affirmed and adopted the decision of the arbitrator.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

July 29, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.