Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Nurse's earning ability can't be based on snapshot of wages at one time

In Wyoming, to determine an injured worker's ability to earn a living, the worker's preinjury wages and work schedule, the nature of her injury and the resulting physical limitations, her postinjury employment history, and her postinjury employment prospects should be considered.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Schossow v. State of Wyoming ex rel., Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation Division, No. S-10-0183 (Wyo. 07/15/11).

Ruling: The Wyoming Supreme Court held that a nurse was not entitled to permanent partial disability benefits or vocational rehabilitation benefits.

What it means: In Wyoming, to determine an injured worker's ability to earn a living, the worker's preinjury wages and work schedule, the nature of her injury and the resulting physical limitations, her postinjury employment history, and her postinjury employment prospects should be considered.

Summary: A nurse was lifting a comatose patient when she felt a "pop" in her back and her leg went numb. She underwent surgery. After surgery, she was no longer able to work as a nurse due to restrictions imposed by her doctor. When she was released to work, she began working at a different medical facility for a lower salary that she previously earned as a nurse. She sought permanent partial disability benefits or vocational rehabilitation benefits. A vocational evaluation revealed that there were three jobs available to the nurse with a salary "95 percent or higher than her salary" at the time of her injury. The Wyoming Supreme Court held that the nurse was not entitled to benefits.

The nurse asserted that her earning capacity had to be calculated based on the wage she earned immediately upon returning to the workforce following her injury. The workers' safety and compensation division argued that the focus should be on an injured worker's actual ability to earn. The court said that an injured worker's ability to earn a living cannot be determined in a "vacuum" or be "based on a static snapshot" of a worker's employment status and wage at any one time. The nurse's assertion could inhibit the division's ability to accurately assess a worker's earning capacity and limit the availability of benefits to workers. It could also discourage workers from seeking employment after an injury.

The nurse's initial return to work was on a part-time basis. At the time of the hearing, the nurse was earning more than she earned prior to her injury. The court found that the nurse failed to show that due to her injury, she was unable to return to work at a wage at least 95 percent of her preinjury income.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

August 25, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.