Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Teacher strikes out on claim for benefits for softball game injury

In Illinois, an accidental injury occurring during a voluntary athletic event does not arise out of and in the course of employment.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Costello v. Proviso West School District 209, 19 ILWCLB 91 (Ill. W.C. Comm. 2011).

Ruling: The Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission held that a teacher was not entitled to benefits for injuries sustained in a softball game.

What it means: In Illinois, an accidental injury occurring during a voluntary athletic event does not arise out of and in the course of employment unless the injured worker was ordered or assigned by the employer to participate.

Summary: A school teacher injured his left ankle while playing a game of softball between two teams of teachers. The teacher's supervisor testified that the purpose of the game was to have fun and build camaraderie with other departments. She also said that the school did not sponsor the game, no one was required to play, and there were no repercussions or reprimands for teachers who did not play. All teachers were paid whether or not they played. The teacher testified he agreed to participate because he felt pressured by his supervisor that if he did not go it would reflect negatively on his evaluation.

The arbitrator denied benefits. It could not be seriously argued that playing softball was the essence of the job of an English teacher or that the teacher's participation in the game was incidental to his employment. The teacher exercised his own free will at first in deciding not to play and again later when he changed his mind and decided to play. Upon review, the commission affirmed and adopted the decision of the arbitrator.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

September 6, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.