Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Commander fails to secure benefits for post-termination fainting

In Illinois, the stress of being laid off is a stress to which all workers are occasionally subjected. A worker's injuries resulting from such stress do not arise out of her employment.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: McCarthy v. City of Warrenville, 19 ILWCLB 101 (Ill. W.C. Comm. 2011).

Ruling: The Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission held that a police commander failed to prove that an accidental injury occurred which arose out of and in the course of her employment.

What it means: In Illinois, the stress of being laid off is a stress to which all workers are occasionally subjected. A worker's injuries resulting from such stress do not arise out of her employment.

Summary: A police commander attended a meeting during which she was informed that her position had been eliminated. She testified she had no warning regarding the subject matter of the meeting and she was shocked and extremely upset. She walked back to the police station feeling nauseous. She testified that she went into the restroom and then passed out, injuring her forehead and knee when she fell. The workers' compensation arbitrator denied benefits, finding that the commander failed to prove her injury arose out of or in the course of her employment. Upon review, the commission affirmed and adopted the decision of the arbitrator.

The arbitrator said it was clear that her employment was terminated at the conclusion of the meeting. It could be argued that she continued to be in the course of her employment at the time of the injury, but the injury did not arise out of any risk incidental to her employment. The fall was idiopathic and there was no defective condition in the restroom that increased the risk of falling or the effects of the fall. Also, the stress of being laid off, disciplined, or fired is a stress to which all workers are occasionally subjected.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

September 12, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.