Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Medical opinions support permanent total disability award for manager

In Tennessee, a worker may be entitled to permanent total disability benefits if his doctors initially opine that he was partially disabled but later conclude that he was totally disabled.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: High v. Sumner County, No. M2010-01899-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. 07/21/11).

Ruling: The Tennessee Court of Appeals held that a manager was entitled to permanent total disability benefits.

What it means: In Tennessee, a worker may be entitled to permanent total disability benefits if his doctors initially opine that he was partially disabled but later conclude that he was totally disabled.

Summary: A parts department manager for a county injured his back and leg while lifting a 100-pound hydraulic motor for a spindle. He underwent surgery and returned to work. He reinjured himself while pushing a 50-pound box with his foot. He underwent another surgery. His doctor imposed permanent restrictions on his physical activity that included light duty with no repetitive bending or lifting and no operation of machinery. The manager did not return to work because the county could not accommodate his restrictions. The Tennessee Court of Appeals held that the manager was entitled to permanent total disability benefits.

His doctor opined that he had a 20 percent permanent physical impairment to the whole person. Later, the doctor wrote a letter stating that he doubted that the manager would ever return to work. The manager's pain management physician also thought he was not able to perform any type of work. The county adopted an occupational compensation plan to provide benefits to injured workers. The county offered the manager a lump sum of $64,064 in accordance with the plan's provision for permanent partial disability. The manager rejected the offer.

The court pointed out that the manager's doctors opined that he was "totally disabled" and would not ever return to "any functioning work." The county relied on the doctor's letter indicating a 20 percent impairment. The court said that the manager's doctors initially may have thought he was only partially disabled but later concluded that he was totally disabled. Therefore, a different provision of the plan had to be used to determine the manager's benefits.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

September 27, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.