Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Apportionment profoundly impacting comp system, says medical expert

Determining causation in the workers' comp system can be challenging, especially when the injured worker is older and/or has preexisting conditions.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Complicating it even more is identifying what percentage of an injury is work-related and what portion is due to age or other factors.

Florida is among the states that includes apportionment in its workers' comp system. The inclusion of medical care in 2003 has had a significant change in that state, according to a medical expert.

"This has huge implications," said Dr. Jesse Lipnick of Southeastern Integrated Medicine in Gainesville, Fla. As Lipnick explained, plaintiffs' attorney's fees may be dependent on the amount of the award to the injured worker. "What's happening is a lot of these guys are getting out of workers' comp. They've said, 'It's not worth doing workers' comp anymore because I don't get reimbursed.'"

September 30, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.