Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Landscaper wins benefits after altercation with supervisor

In New York, an employer is not liable for an injury that was caused by an injured worker's "willful intention" to cause injury to another. An injury resulting from an impulsive act, however, may be compensable.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Fascilla Landscaping, 111 NYWCLR 151 (N.Y.W.C.B. 2011).

Ruling: The New York Workers' Compensation Board held that a landscaper, who was injured when his supervisor threw him to the ground, sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.

What it means: In New York, an employer is not liable for an injury that was caused by an injured worker's "willful intention" to cause injury to another. An injury resulting from an impulsive act, however, may be compensable.

Summary: Upon mandatory review, the full board held that a landscaper, who was injured by his supervisor at work, sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. The landscaper testified that he got into an altercation with his supervisor regarding the way the landscaper was blowing and raking leaves. The supervisor threw the landscaper to the ground and stepped on his chest. The full board explained that the altercation between the landscaper and his supervisor was not purely personal. There was a nexus between the alleged assault and the employment, as the landscaper, a coworker, and the supervisor all testified that the incident stemmed from the way the landscaper was raking leaves. Also, there was insufficient evidence in the record to find that the landscaper's actions were willful and deliberate, as opposed to impulsive. Therefore, the landscaper sustained an accident that arose out of and in the course of his employment. The full board further found that the treating doctor provided persuasive testimony that the landscaper sustained causally related injuries to the low back upon landing on the ground.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

October 10, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.