Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Contract for hire not formed over phone sinks jurisdiction

In Kentucky, a contract for hire is not made until the last act necessary for its formation is complete, and the contract is formed at the place where that act is performed.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Graham v. TSL, Ltd., No. 2010-SC-000676-WC (Ky. 08/25/11).

Ruling: The Kentucky Supreme Court held that it did not have jurisdiction over a driver's claim.

What it means: In Kentucky, a contract for hire is not made until the last act necessary for its formation is complete, and the contract is formed at the place where that act is performed.

Summary: A truck driver lived in Kentucky and worked for a company with corporate offices in Missouri and Ohio. When the driver sought a job from the company, he considered himself hired over the phone after a conversation with a company employee in Missouri. The company sent him a bus ticket to travel to Missouri for a driving test, training program, and drug test. After this, the company provided him with a letter for hire and a truck, and he began working. The driver hauled automobiles throughout the country. He received his assignments from a dispatch office in Missouri, and the company deposited his payroll checks directly from its office in Ohio. While unloading an automobile from his truck in New Jersey, he fell and injured his foot. The driver sought benefits in Kentucky. The company denied the claim, asserting that Kentucky lacked jurisdiction because the employment was not principally located in any state, and the contract for hire was made in Missouri. The Kentucky Supreme Court held that Kentucky did not have jurisdiction over the claim.

The driver asserted that he was working under a contract of hire made over the phone in Kentucky. The court explained that although a contract made by telephone is formed at the place where the acceptor speaks his acceptance, the parties' contract here was not formed until the driver completed the various requirements in Missouri. The company's vice president indicated that completing the requirements was a mandatory prerequisite to any contract of hire entered into and approved by the company. The driver may have considered himself hired over the telephone, but the evidence was not so overwhelming to compel a conclusion that a contract was formed at that time.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

October 13, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.