Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Technician proves compensability of altercation with coworker

In New York, altercations between coworkers generally are considered compensable, regardless of fault, if the injury arises out of a clash over work-related differences.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Kings County Hospital, 111 NYWCLR 184 (N.Y.W.C.B. 2011).

Ruling: The New York Workers' Compensation Board held that a technician's injuries arose of out of and in the course of her employment.

What it means: In New York, altercations between coworkers generally are considered compensable, regardless of fault, if the injury arises out of a clash over work-related differences.

Summary: A patient care technician for a hospital had a problem with someone opening her purse at work. She went to care for a patient and asked her coworkers not to touch her purse. A coworker began uttering profanities at her. When the technician left work, the coworker followed her outside and across the street and physically assaulted her, rendering her unconscious. The board held that the incident leading to the technician's injuries arose of out of and in the course of her employment, and therefore, the claim was compensable. The incident occurred during the course of the technician's workday and was therefore presumed to have arisen out of her employment, absent substantial evidence to the contrary.

The board found that the carrier failed to rebut the presumption that the injuries sustained by the technician arose out of and in the course of her employment. A sufficient nexus between the incident and the technician's employment was found in the fact that the incident began during the workday at the employer's premises and was perpetrated by the coworker, who followed the technician out of work and across the street, where she physically assaulted the technician. In addition, there was no evidence of any personal relationship outside of work between the technician and the coworker.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

November 10, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.