Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

State's failure to file accident report extends filing deadline

In Kansas, if an employer has notice of a worker's work-related accident and fails to file an accident report, the time limitation for the worker to file a claim for compensation is extended beyond the usual deadline of 200 days.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Nilges v. State of Kansas, No. 105,787 (Kan. Ct. App. 11/23/11).

Ruling: The Kansas Court of Appeals held that an operator's claim for compensation was timely filed.

What it means: In Kansas, if an employer has notice of a worker's work-related accident and fails to file an accident report, whether or not the accident report is required, the time limitation for the worker to file a claim for compensation is extended beyond the usual deadline of 200 days after the accident.

Summary: An equipment operator for the state was injured when he refastened a lid on a water truck. While descending from the truck, his feet slipped, and he held onto the truck with his hands. He immediately felt pain in his upper back. He continued to work that day, but his pain progressively worsened. That evening, he reported the incident to his supervisor. The operator said he requested an accident report to be completed, but his supervisor repeatedly denied his requests. The operator sought medical treatment on his own. An accident report was completed seven months after the incident. The state authorized him to receive medical treatment and later canceled its authorization. The operator filed a claim for benefits. The state argued that the operator's claim for compensation was not timely because it was filed more than 200 days after his accident. The Kansas Court of Appeals held that the operator's claim was timely.

The operator admitted that he did not file his claim within 200 days of the date of the accident, as generally required. He argued that the state's failure to file an accident report until seven months later extended his deadline for filing his claim.

The court explained that the time period for serving a claim on the employer can be extended in certain circumstances. The court concluded that if an employer has notice of a worker's work-related accident and fails to file an accident report, whether or not the accident report is required, the time limitation for the worker to file a claim for compensation is extended beyond the usual deadline of 200 days after the accident. The court said that the reason for extending the time is that if an employer gives notice of an accident, the worker will receive material advising him of his right, including the deadline to file a claim.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

January 9, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.