Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Waste Water from Hydraulic Fracturing May Have Led to Ohio Earthquakes

State regulators have asked for a moratorium on injection wells from fracking.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

By JARED SHELLY, senior editor/web editor at Risk & Insurance®

Opponents of hydraulic fracturing often vehemently declare that the natural gas drilling process leads to unsafe drinking water in homes around fracking sites -- sometimes the water is so gaseous it can be lit on fire.

But opponents may now have another talking point, as regulators in Ohio have declared a moratorium at five deep wells in the state, citing a possible link between storing waste water from fracking and seismic activity.

Fracking involves blasting water, sand and chemicals into the earth to break up layers of rock underground, allowing for the extraction of the natural gas trapped in those layers. Much of the waste water from fracking in Pennsylvania is housed in injection wells in Ohio. In fact, the Wall Street Journal reported that Ohio has 194 wells, while Pennsylvania only has seven; the state's geology in large part won't allow for that method of storing waste water

But the environmental risks of that method of water storage could be dire. Youngstown, Ohio has been hit with 11 earthquakes since December 2010, when D&L Energy Inc. began drilling wastewater deep wells. The most recent was a 4.0 magnitude quake on Dec. 31, which came on the heels of a 2.7 magnitude earthquake on Christmas Eve.

Arkansas regulators declared their own moratorium after earthquakes last year. Youngstown Mayor Charles P. Sammarone even bought himself earthquake insurance, according to news reports.

While proponents of fracking cite it as a boon for the economy and say that there's no proof of a direct link between fracking and seismic activity, the insurance industry could and should be put on notice.

Recent developments may move the fracking debate away from the hazards of the fracking process and toward the hazards of storing waste water, said Jeffrey Hanneman director of the environmental practice at Aon Risk Solutions.

"There could be alternatives that have to be developed," he said, noting that perhaps drillers should put waste wells in places less susceptible to earthquakes or use trucks or rail lines to ship waste water to safer containment wells.

"But," he said, "the link between seismic activity and injection wells is still speculative at this point."

This development could have vast insurance implications. If earthquake damage could be tied to fracking wastewater disposal practices, the involved drilling company may have a lawsuit on its hands and rely on its liability insurance, said Hanneman.

"It's currently an insurable risk that has not gotten too much attention from the insurance marketplace right now," he said, "because we need more evidence that there's a link between seismic activity and fracking."

But the Ohio quakes have certainly raised some eyebrows.

January 10, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.