Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Store employee awarded benefits for wipeout in mall parking lot

In Florida, an accident is compensable when an employer creates an increased risk of injury because of a hazard on the route a worker customarily and necessarily uses to exit from work.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Liguori v. Helzberg Diamonds, 18 FLWCLB 188 (Fla. JCC, Tampa 2011).

Ruling: A Florida judge of compensation claims held that a worker's accident in the parking lot while walking to her car at the end of her shift was compensable.

What it means: In Florida, an accident is compensable when an employer creates an increased risk of injury because of a hazard on the route a worker customarily and necessarily uses to exit from work, and the accident occurred because of the increased hazard.

Summary: A worker at a jewelry store in a mall worked until the store closed. She was not allowed to leave the store until she and two coworkers completed their work. The store preferred that the three employees leave by the same exit to the mall and park in the same area in the mall lot. By the time the worker and her coworkers left work, the mall dimmed the lights in the parking lot. While walking to her car, the worker tripped over a parking stop and fell on her knees. The store denied compensability because it occurred in a parking lot that was owned by the mall and not operated for the exclusive use of the jewelry store employees. The JCC disagreed and awarded benefits.

The JCC found that the accident occurred because of the increased hazard of the dim lighting. If she had been allowed to leave when the mall closed, the lighting would have been at full strength and she likely would not have fallen. Since the store created the risk of injury by extending the claimant's work hours past the time at which full lighting was available, the claimant's injuries were compensable.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

February 6, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.