Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Patricia Piccinini

Vice President
Aon, Baltimore

Broker Prefers a Road Not Taken

Sometimes the best risk management move is the one that isn't made -- although that might not be so evident if it's not understood throughout an organization prior to a loss.

Patricia Piccinini, vice president with Aon Risk Solutions, understands this and helps clients determine through critical analysis which risks to insure and which to retain.

Laura McWeeney, former director of Maryland's Insurance Division and now associate general counsel to the University of Maryland University College, was in her previous role fielding numerous questions from a state public transportation agency about the benefits and drawbacks of purchasing business interruption insurance for its rail lines through two existing coverages: An inland marine rail car floater and an excess property policy.

"Ms. Piccinini suggested a conference call with myself, the rail risk manager, and the carrier for these coverages so we could have an open discussion with potential scenarios on both policies and see if (the agency) had resources to handle the situation if a loss occurred, or if the business interruption coverage was a cost-effective and necessary route to go," McWeeney said.

Ultimately, the state agency decided to retain the business interruption risk and not purchase coverage, but that decision in no way diminishes the value of Piccinini's coordination of the coverage examination, McWeeney said. "Had the broker not helped us with this issue, there could have been a claim involving loss of revenue, and there would have been much turmoil about not having the coverage and why didn't we have it."


Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints
--
--

February 21, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.