Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Officer's misrepresentations justify disqualification of past, future benefits

In New York, a worker's serious misrepresentation of his disability to the carrier's doctor in contrast to video evidence warrants disqualifying him from past and future indemnity benefits.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Ostego County Sheriff's Department, 111 NYWCLR 248 (N.Y.W.C.B. 2011).

Ruling: The New York Workers' Compensation Board found that an officer was disqualified from indemnity benefits because he misrepresented his disability.

What it means: In New York, a worker's serious misrepresentation of his disability to the carrier's doctor in contrast to video evidence showing he engaged in very athletic physical movement without tentativeness warrants both mandatory and discretionary penalties disqualifying him from past and future indemnity benefits.

Summary: A corrections officer for a sheriff's department injured his left leg in an altercation with an inmate. Thirteen years later, he told the carrier's doctor that his left leg was unstable and that he had episodes of falling down as a result. He told the doctor he had "no particular hobbies." Video evidence showed the officer engaged in very athletic physical movement without tentativeness indicative of a person with an unstable left knee. His first-degree black belt test in tae kwan do occurred less than two months before the doctor's examination. The board found the officer made a material misrepresentation of the truth. Based on these serious misrepresentations, the board found the officer was subject to a mandatory penalty of disqualification of indemnity benefits and a discretionary penalty.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

February 23, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.