Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Fatal comfort break on side of the road is covered by comp

In Florida, a worker's decision to pull his vehicle over to a narrow shoulder during a business-related road trip to urinate falls within the personal comfort doctrine.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Abrams v. Earl Colvard, Inc. d/b/a Boulevard Tire Center, 18 FLWCLB 211 (Fla. JCC, Miami 2011).

Ruling: A Florida Judge of Compensation Claims held that a repairman's children were entitled to death benefits for his fatal vehicular accident.

What it means: In Florida, a worker's decision to pull his vehicle over on a narrow shoulder of a road during a business-related road trip to urinate falls within the personal comfort doctrine. Therefore, any injuries sustained while performing such activity falls within the course of his employment.

Summary: A roadside repair serviceman traveled from location to location to repair tires and service vehicles roadside. He was on his lunch break at home when his supervisor called and instructed him to deliver tires to two customers and return the old tires to the employer's location. The serviceman performed his duties and was returning to the employer's location in the late evening when he stopped his vehicle on a narrow shoulder of the road. A coworker passenger testified that he exited the vehicle to urinate when another vehicle hit him. He died before the ambulance arrived. The JCC found in favor of the serviceman and awarded death benefits to his children.

The JCC noted that although there was conflicting evidence regarding the serviceman's activity at the precise time of his death, the evidence supported a contention that he pulled over to urinate. The JCC concluded that he did not abandon his job and that his actions fell within the personal comfort doctrine. Stopping for a break to urinate along the side of the road after a long workday was reasonable. There was no departure from his employment.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

February 27, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.