Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Editor's Note: Pull the Trigger

As you read this, the leaders of the Captive Insurance Companies Association are pushing hard to hire a full-time lobbyist. It's a good idea, and it's high time CICA make haste and pulled the trigger.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Nothing gets done in Washington, D.C., without a hired gun. Given the packed legislative agenda facing the insurance and reinsurance industries in the wake of Dodd-Frank, it's a good bet that any captive industry lobbyist is going to be working overtime.

State domiciles, from Vermont to Montana to Hawaii, could use a little help too. State captive organizations do a good job representing the industry in front of legislature, but less so before Congress. That's where a CICA lobbyist would step in.

There is a risk, of course, in that the CICA may find itself in a sticky position with regard to its domicile neutrality. What if two domiciles square off because they're on opposite sides of a piece of federal legislation? Which side of the issue is the CICA going to back? CICA leaders know this, and insist they are not going to take sides. After 40 years of domicile neutrality, I think we can trust their word.

Captive interests have banded together in the past, and often with satisfying results. It was CICA and the Vermont Captive Insurance Association, which nearly five years ago managed to rebuff a U.S. Treasury initiative that would have prohibited onshore captives from deducting discounted loss reserves.

It was also a wake-up call for the captive industry to fight back. The only question is how it took so long for the CICA so long to hire a legislative affairs expert.

-- Cyril Tuohy, Managing Editor

March 1, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.