Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Millwright's physical improvement nixes increase in benefits

In Idaho, an injured worker alleging a change in condition must show an increased level of impairment.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Magee v. Thompson Creek Mining Co., No. 36352 2011 (Idaho 01/24/12).

Ruling: The Idaho Supreme Court held that a millwright was not entitled to an increase in benefits because he did not establish a change in his condition.

What it means: In Idaho, an injured worker alleging a change in condition must show an increased level of impairment.

Summary: A millwright for a mining company slipped or misstepped while walking up a flight of stairs at work. He fell on the stair's landing. He sought treatment for back pain that radiated into his right leg. He was awarded workers' compensation benefits. He sought an increase in benefits, alleging a change in his condition. He described his physical condition as "about the same" but was diagnosed with major depressive disorder with suicidal thoughts related to chronic pain and attributable to his work injury. His neurosurgeon implanted a spinal stimulator to diminish his pain. The Idaho Supreme Court held that the millwright was not entitled to an increase in benefits.

The court found that he failed to establish a change in condition warranting a modification of his benefits. The millwright contended that his major depressive disorder leading to suicidal thoughts was directly related to the chronic pain caused by his work-related accident. However, his physical condition did not change, and his depression improved. He was no longer suicidal after therapy and prescription antidepressants. Also, the implantation of the spinal stimulator significantly reduced his pain. His doctors agreed that his physical condition improved. He decreased his dependence on medication by half.

The court concluded that he was still capable of working in a sedentary to light capacity. A vocational consultant found that his employment capabilities improved following the implantation of the spinal stimulator.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

March 8, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.