Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Enterprise Risk Management: A Luxury We Cannot Afford

The risk management function can be transferred to capable service providers in lean times.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Companies are voting on the concept of enterprise risk management with their payroll dollars. That means they are cutting risk management staffs and by doing that they are cutting the capability of their company to engage in enterprise risk management.

Tasks that might have been left to a hefty risk management department in better times are now floating back up the ranks to the treasury, if not the CEO.

What's behind this trend is not a disregard for the concept of enterprise risk management. One could argue that there is no argument against implementing enterprise risk management. After all, who would propose that any company's risks should not be exhaustively studied and managed?

What's behind this trend is the economic reality that there are only so many non-revenue producing functions that companies can house these days and still see net income figures in nice black numbers; numbers not bracketed by those soul-stopping parentheses that indicate a loss.

What's happened to risk management budgets is the same thing that happens in some companies with advertising budgets in lean times. They must be cut because they can't directly be shown to produce revenue.

Times are no easier for the carriers and brokers that engage with their clients to manage or transfer risk. Brokerages have cut staff in many cases to continue to produce returns for investors. Carriers are pinched by flat or soft pricing, mediocre investment returns and the fact there is only so much more releasing of reserves that they can engage in.

But these economic times necessitate that this is also a time when the risk transfer equation and who bears responsibility for it is made more clear. Rather than expand risk management functions within their own organizations, insurance buyers are turning to their brokers and carriers and saying, "You manage this risk, that's what I'm paying you for."

The head of a company who is engaged in his company's survival in 2012 is conscious that the decisions he makes impact just how many of his employees will still bring home paychecks to their families in six months, a year or in five years.

Expansions of what comprises sound risk management or handing off responsibility for the company's survival isn't what he or she is putting their energies into now. It's not the practice of good enterprise risk management, or even good risk management; it's simply good management.

DAN REYNOLDS is senior editor of Risk & Insurance®. He can be reached at dreynolds@lrp.com.

April 13, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.