Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Missouri governor rejects workers' comp legislation

Saying the proposal "moves us backward on protecting Missouri's productive workers," Gov. Jay Nixon vetoed legislation endorsed by the insurance industry. In a veto letter, Nixon cited several reasons for his "disapproval" of the measure.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Among its provisions was a move of occupational disease coverage under the workers' comp system, rather than allowing lawsuits over these claims. Nixon noted that existing law allows workers suffering from work-related occupational diseases to seek redress by bringing a civil action against their employer, including workers who suffer from "serious and deadly" diseases such as mesothelioma and cardiopulmonary disease involving long-term workplace exposure to toxic substances.

"Taking this right away from workers suffering from serious and deadly occupational diseases ... is not acceptable," Nixon said.

The bill also would have prohibited injured workers from suing their coworkers for their occupational injuries. A final provision would have stated that all administrative remedies must be exhausted before civil actions involving injury or death filed by the employee could move forward.

"It is worth noting that both employers and employees have a shared interest in a timely and efficient disposition of claims," the governor said. "It is questionable whether holding a civil action in abeyance pending exhaustion of all administrative remedies -- terms that, moreover, are not defined in the bill -- furthers those goals. Procedural requirements should foster an efficient and equitable resolution for all parties."

The legislature passed the bill before taking its spring recess. There was speculation the issue could come up again before the Legislature adjourns in May.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

April 16, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.