Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Benefits granted to driller for accident on way home from work

In Kansas, the inherent travel exception to the going and coming rule is a method to determine whether a worker already assumed the duties of employment when he was going to or returning from work.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Craig v. VAL Energy, Inc., No. 105,949 (Kan. Ct. App. 03/16/12).

Ruling: The Kansas Court of Appeals held that a driller was entitled to compensation for injuries he sustained in a car accident while driving home from work.

What it means: In Kansas, the inherent travel exception to the going and coming rule is a method to determine whether a worker already assumed the duties of employment when he was going to or returning from work.

Summary: A driller for an energy company was responsible for his crew, including picking them up and driving them to the oil rig site. He used his personal vehicle, and the company reimbursed him for mileage. The rig was broken, so the driller and his crew were temporarily assigned to a shop. After leaving the shop to drive home, the driller and one crew member were involved in a car accident. The driller was injured and sought benefits. The Kansas Court of Appeals held that his injury arose out of and in the course of employment, so he was entitled to benefits.

The court explained that the inherent travel exception to the going and coming rule determines whether travel was a required part of the job so that the worker assumes the duties of employment the moment he leaves the house until he arrived home at the end of the workday. Here, the driller was required to make sure that crew members made it to the drill site. He was reimbursed for mileage for his travel, which included picking up and dropping off his crew. Even though the work site changed temporarily, the company continued to reimburse the driller.

The court said the driller would not have been hired if he did not have the capability to drive and transport his crew. The court said that despite the temporary change in location the company and the driller received a mutual benefit from the continued transportation arrangement. Therefore, the going and coming rule did not bar the driller's claim.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

May 7, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.