Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Employer authorized to select second treating physician after first retired

In Iowa, after the retirement of a worker's authorized treating physician, the employer is permitted to select another treating physician.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Spencer v. Annett Holdings, Inc., No. 2-031/11-1032 (Iowa Ct. App. 03/28/12, unpublished).

Ruling: In an unpublished decision, the Iowa Court of Appeals held that an employer had the right to choose an injured worker's treating physician after the retirement of his original authorized treating physician.

What it means: In Iowa, after the retirement of a worker's authorized treating physician, the employer is permitted to select another treating physician.

Summary: An injured worker's employer-selected treating physician retired and referred him to another doctor. The employer learned of the treating physician's retirement when it received a request for payment for services performed from the new doctor. The employer designated a different physician as the second authorized treating physician. The worker sought alternate care, contending that the referral from his original authorized treating physician became authorized care. The employer countered that it had the right to choose medical care upon the resignation of its treating physician. The Iowa Court of Appeals held that the employer had the right to choose the worker's care after the original treating physician's retirement.

The court explained that generally the employer is permitted to choose the medical care to be furnished to an injured worker. Also, an employer is not entitled to interfere with the medical judgment of its own treating physician, and the referral by an authorized physician to another practitioner generally does not require the employer's consent. If a worker seeks alternate care, he must show that the authorized care is unreasonable.

The court said that the original treating physician was not making a referral but "recommending his own replacement." The worker failed to prove that treatment by the second authorized treating physician was not reasonably suited to treat his injury or was unduly inconvenient.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

June 7, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.