Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Stressful encounter not enough to deliver benefits

In Illinois, where a worker alleges a mental disability due to a nonphysical trauma, she must show that the psychological injury was caused by a sudden severe emotional shock.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Dixon v. CTA, 20 ILWCLB 38 (Ill. W.C. Comm. 2011).

Ruling: The Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission held that a train operator was not entitled to benefits for her alleged mental injury.

What it means: In Illinois, where a worker alleges a mental disability due to a nonphysical trauma, she must show that the psychological injury was caused by a sudden severe emotional shock traceable to a definite time, place, and cause, which resulted in psychological injury or harm.

Summary: A rapid transit train operator was approaching a station when she observed a man standing on the edge of the platform. As she pulled into the station, she heard a loud thump on the train. She stopped the train and looked out the window, but did not see anything unusual.

After pulling the train into the station, she saw a man lying face down on the platform. She said her heart was racing, she got a headache, and she felt faint. She called for help and approached the man, who pointed to his arm and said it hurt. After the incident, the operator could not return to work. She had trouble sleeping, a loss of appetite, and migraines. She filed a claim for a mental disability. The commission denied benefits, finding that she failed to meet the burden for a compensable mental-mental trauma.

There was no evidence that the passenger made contact with the train or had merely passed out on the platform.

The operator did not come upon a gruesome scene that one would consider a "sudden severe emotional shock."

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

June 25, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.