Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Study: Inspections reduce injuries, save money

A new study suggests that randomized safety inspections improve safety without causing burdensome expense or job loss.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

An environmental management expert at Harvard Business School teamed up with two other researchers to study the effects of workplace inspections. It concluded that the inspections resulted in a 9.4 percent decline in injury rates and a 26 percent reduction in injury cost but did not affect employment, total earnings, sales, or the survival of the company.

The researchers identified more than 400 workplaces that had been inspected between 1996 and 2006 for which they could find similar companies that were eligible for inspection but had not yet been selected. They used workers' comp claims over the period ranging from four years before through four years after the inspections to determine illness and injury rates. They also looked at injuries during the same time span for the companies that were not inspected.

"Our study suggests that randomized inspections work as they're meant to, improving safety while not undermining the company's ability to do business," said Michael Toffel of Harvard Business School. "Now we'd like to get more data to see exactly how inspections reduce injuries, and to investigate what kinds of companies would get the most or least benefit from safety regulation."

One observer suggested the study be used as a model for testing whether proposed future regulations are likely to be effective. "Safety regulations are often put in place without scientifically credible evidence of their likely effects," said Jon Baron, president of the Washington, D.C.-based Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. Ideally, he said, all new government regulations should be subjected to similar randomized studies before being widely implemented.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

July 9, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.