Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Farm employee secures benefits for fall caused by gusty winds

In Illinois, work outside subjects a worker to a greater risk of injury than the general public from wind gusts.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Torres v. Golden Oaks Farms, 20 ILWCLB 69 (Ill. W.C. Comm. 2012).

Ruling: The Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission held that a worker's back injury, sustained when he was knocked over by a gust of wind while performing his work duties, arose out of and in the course of his employment.

What it means: In Illinois, work outside subjects a worker to a greater risk of injury than the general public from wind gusts. Therefore, injuries sustained if the worker loses his balance and falls due to windy conditions while performing his work duties arise out of and in the course of his employment.

Summary: A worker at a farm was performing light-duty work picking up bottles outside and placing them into a garbage container. It was extremely windy. He was holding the container when a gust of wind caused him to lose his balance. He caught his foot on some dirt. The container flew from his hand, and he fell backward onto his outstretched left arm. He explained that he was attempting to prevent further injury to his lower back from a prior incident. He sustained injuries to his shoulder and lumbar spine. The arbitrator found the worker's injury arose out of and in the course of employment and awarded benefits. Upon review, the commission affirmed and adopted the decision of the arbitrator.

The arbitrator rejected the farm's assertion that the worker was not subjected to any risks greater than that of the general public. The worker was required to work outside in the wind while the general public was not required to work outside. Also, the general public was free to remove themselves from a windy environment, whereas the worker was not permitted to do so. Therefore, the worker was subjected to a risk greater than that to which the general public was exposed.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

July 19, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.