Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Widow fails to prove worker's injuries caused death

In Florida, conditions caused by a work-related injury that develop after the original work accident can be compensable if causation is established.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Garcia v. Sedano's Supermarket, 19 FLWCLB 91 (Fla. JCC, Miami 2012).

Ruling: A Florida judge of compensation claims held that a widow failed to prove that the worker's work injuries were the major contributing cause of his fatal pancreatitis.

What it means: In Florida, conditions caused by a work-related injury that develop after the original work accident can be compensable if causation is established.

Summary: A worker sustained an injury to his left foot when he fell from a ladder at work. He died two months later due to pancreatitis. His widow contended that the worker was left without access to any narcotic pain medication seven days after he was discharged from surgery. Therefore, she had to give him over-the-counter acetaminophen at levels exceeding the maximum daily dose, which caused the pancreatitis.

The employer argued that the worker's pancreatitis was caused by his alcohol abuse. Agreeing with the employer, the JCC found the widow did not meet her burden of establishing that the work injury was the major contributing cause of the decedent's pancreatitis and resulting death.

The JCC found persuasive the testimony of the treating surgeon and the employer's forensic pathologist, who opined that gastritis caused the worker's death and that his alcoholism was too pronounced to be overcome.

The JCC pointed out that even if the worker self-medicated with excessive amounts of over-the-counter acetaminophen the widow failed to demonstrate that his death was a natural or unavoidable result of the work injury. Her actions constituted an independent indifference to the warnings and instructions for the medication. The alleged careless administration of the over-the-counter drugs by the widow was an independent intervening cause of the worker's death.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

September 6, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.