Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Firefighter's bear hug of coworker constitutes horseplay, nixes benefits

In Illinois, a worker's injury during an act that constitutes a personal action to which the worker has voluntarily increased his risk of injury or constitutes horseplay does not arise out of the worker's employment.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Kaschub v. Darien-Woodridge Fire Protection District, 20 ILWCLB 100 (Ill. W.C. Comm. 2012).

Ruling: The Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission denied benefits to a firefighter because his injuries did not arise out of his employment. His personal actions voluntarily increased his risk of injury and constituted noncompensable horseplay.

What it means: In Illinois, a worker's injury during an act that constitutes a personal action to which the worker has voluntarily increased his risk of injury or constitutes horseplay does not arise out of the worker's employment.

Summary: A firefighter/paramedic was in a happy and excited mood because he learned that he did not have to work overtime and could attend his scheduled snowmobiling trip. He came up behind a coworker and put his arms around him in a bear hug. The firefighter pinned the coworker's arms to his sides. The coworker was startled and reacted by twisting in an effort to get free. As he twisted, both men fell over and the firefighter was injured. In denying benefits, the workers' compensation arbitrator found the firefighter failed to prove he sustained an accident that arose out of his employment. The commission affirmed and adopted the decision of the arbitrator.

The firefighter did not offer evidence to suggest that his actions were the result of a work-related duty. Also, there was no competent evidence that the injury was caused or related to his work duties or work environment. His accident occurred solely because he gave the coworker a bear hug and startled him. The firefighter's accident was caused by actions personal to him that voluntarily increased his risk of injury or constituted horseplay. Accordingly, his accident was not compensable.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

September 10, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.