Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Carrying loaded handgun in company truck cuts off benefits

In Pennsylvania, if a worker commits misconduct and is properly discharged for that misconduct, he is precluded from receiving compensation for loss of earnings from the date of his discharge.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Dougherty v. Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC, 27 PAWCLR 110 (Pa. W.C.A.B. 2012).

Ruling: The Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Appeal Board reversed the workers' compensation judge's conclusion that a driver's discharge from his employment for violating the employer's weapons policy did not necessitate a suspension of benefits. The board ordered a suspension as of the date of the claimant's discharge.

What it means: In Pennsylvania, if a worker commits misconduct and is properly discharged for that misconduct, he is precluded from receiving compensation for loss of earnings from the date of his discharge.

Summary: A delivery truck driver fractured his ankle when he fell while exiting a company truck. Ten days later, he was discharged for violating the employer's weapons policy after the employer discovered his loaded handgun in the company truck. The employer sought to terminate the driver's benefits, alleging that he was fully recovered from his work injury and that his employment had ended due to willful misconduct. The WCJ denied the petition and a suspension of benefits whether based on the driver's liver disease as an intervening cause of disability or his discharge from employment. The board affirmed the denial of the termination petition. However, the board determined that the WCJ erred in awarding ongoing benefits, as the driver's misconduct led to his discharge. The driver's carrying of a loaded 38 revolver in the company truck in violation of the weapons policy constituted willful misconduct, and he failed to establish good cause for his actions.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

September 27, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.