Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Marijuana for pain counterintuitive to goals of workers' comp, paper says

Drug screening for marijuana can provide critical information about potentially problematic workers' comp claims, according to a new white paper. A pharmacy benefit management company says urine drug screening can be an essential tool.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

"The presence of marijuana in a drug screen should be viewed as a red flag by practitioners in the case of any patient receiving opioid therapy for treatment of chronic pain," according to the report. "Studies have shown that illicit drug use -- mainly marijuana -- is statistically linked to a higher rate of eventual dependence on or addiction to opioids."

The paper, Navigating The Issue: Medical Marijuana In The Realm of Workers' Compensation, was developed by myMatrixx. It outlines some of the challenges to the workers' comp system and strategies employers and insurers can take to protect themselves.

Despite its status as illegal under federal law, marijuana is legal for medical purposes in 17 states and the District of Columbia. Several other states are considering legalizing it as well.

"Throughout the country, even in states that have legalized its use, federal law prevents doctors from prescribing marijuana," according to the report. "This conflict between state and federal laws raises any number of issues that directly affect the workers' compensation industry and the workplace as a whole."

No state legalizes the use of marijuana in the workplace or requires employers to allow its use on the job. However, the issue is not black and white.

For example, the report cites a South Dakota case in which it was determined an injured worker had smoked marijuana the previous day. Even though the state does not legalize use of the drug, the burden of proof was on the employer to show that marijuana use constituted an act of willful misconduct.

Marijuana is seen as being similar to codeine in the treatment of pain, the report says. However, it says research indicates the drug is counterproductive for injured workers.

"Several studies associate workers' marijuana smoking with increased absences, tardiness, accidents, workers' compensation claims, and job turnover," it says. "When viewed in light of the primary goal in workers' compensation, which is to return to work, the issue becomes much clearer. The therapeutic effects of medical marijuana treatment are counterintuitive to meeting the intended therapeutic outcome for any injured worker."

The authors recommend employers "frame a strategy with a clinical approach." It suggests a multifaceted approach to pain management, focusing on educating claims professionals, developing advanced technologies, and emphasizing open lines of communication between clinical staff and physicians.

In developing a medical marijuana strategy, the report advises asks:

  • Are all stakeholders viewing the issue from a return-to-work perspective?
  • Are you getting the real-time data and customized risk assessment that enables you to manage patient care from a clinical perspective?
  • Are drug screens included in your strategy and combined with sophisticated analysis and easy-to-interpret reporting?
  • Do you have a third party, professional communication link to prescribing physicians that can directly impact patient care?

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

December 3, 2012

Copyright 2012© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.