Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Worker's failure to join second claim with first isn't fatal to claim

In Kentucky, an injured worker is not required to join her second workers' compensation claim against an employer with a first claim when a hearing was already held on the first claim.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: St. Joseph Hospital v. Frye, No. 2011-CA-001797-WC (Ky. Ct. App. 10/05/12).

Ruling: The Kentucky Court of Appeals held that a worker's second claim against a hospital was not barred due to her failure to join it with an earlier claim.

What it means: In Kentucky, an injured worker is not required to join her second workers' compensation claim against an employer with a first claim when a hearing was already held on the first claim.

Summary: A worker for a hospital sustained a cervical injury from falling five feet from a dumpster platform, striking her head and chin on the lip of the dumpster. She filed a workers' compensation claim. After a hearing was conducted on the first claim, but before the decision was entered, the worker sustained a second work-related injury when she fell on a wet floor while carrying baked potatoes into the cafeteria. Kentucky law states that when a claim is pending, a worker should join all other claims against the employer. A failure to join all accrued causes of action with result in the claims being barred. The hospital argued that the second claim was barred. The Kentucky Court of Appeals held that the second claim was not barred.

The worker argued that the second injury occurred after proof was concluded and a hearing was conducted for the first claim, so it would be unfair to deny her the opportunity to pursue her second claim. The court did not find that the first claim was "pending" when the hearing already occurred. The court said that the worker's second injury occurred after her first claim was already concluded. Although the decision in the first claim had not yet been made, the worker was diligent in her efforts to get the second claim before the employer.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

January 7, 2013

Copyright 2013© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.