Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Full court rules in favor of comp for woman injured during sex

An Australian government worker injured when a lighting fixture fell on her during sex is entitled to workers' comp, ruled a court in that country. The Full Bench of the Federal Court concurred with a federal judge's decision last year, overturning a prior decision.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

The woman had been on a business trip in 2007 when the incident occurred in a hotel room. She was injured on her nose and mouth and suffered depression, and was unable to continue working for the government.

The government's insurer initially approved her claim for workers' comp but later rejected it. An administrative tribunal upheld the insurer's view, saying the injuries were not in the course of her employment and that the government had not induced or encouraged her sexual conduct. The panel also said the sex was not an ordinary incident of an overnight stay.

In rejecting that ruling last year, a judge said "if the applicant had been injured while playing a game of cards in her motel room, she would be entitled to compensation even though it could not be said that her employer induced her to engage in such activity."

The Full Bench said the government's views on the incident were irrelevant. "No approval, express or implied of the respondent's conduct was required," it said.

The government's insurer is considering whether to appeal the case to the High Court, Australia's highest legal authority. "Workers need to be clear about their entitlements and employers should have an understanding of their responsibilities and how to support their staff," said a company spokesman.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

January 14, 2013

Copyright 2013© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.