Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Workers' Comp Changes Challenge Those in Industry

Procedures required by the new workers' comp law in California add burdens to third-party administrators.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

The workers' compensation reform law that went into effect on Jan. 1 in California will not have much impact on employers in the state.

The same cannot be said about its impact on insurers or third-party administrators.

The law, said attorney Michael Sullivan, Los Angeles-based principal of Michael Sullivan and Associates, "is the most ubiquitous change that California has ever seen. It changes so many different parts of the law."

"A lot of the changes," said Long Beach, Calif.-based Darrell Brown, managing director at Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc., "will need to be managed by the claims administrator and will affect how we handle claims."

That includes the creation of independent medical review and independent bill review structures, which move those procedures from the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board and courtroom challenges.

While Brown believes that is, overall, a good change, it could result in "an incredible burden on the claims administrator." It's not just training employees on new procedures, he said, but involves being "dependent on different players" to make sure claims are handled in an effective and efficient manner.

Independent medical review, for example, is not initiated by a TPA, but would be the TPA's financial responsibility, he said. "We will have to watch it very closely to allow for the maximization of efficiency," Brown said.

Some observers believe the series of determinations and appeals that are part of the independent review processes could result in a logjam of claims.

"There could be a delay of 75 days [in the independent medical review process] from the time that somebody requires treatment and the time that an ultimate decision has to be made," said Bruce Albert, managing partner of Albert & Mackenzie in Agoura Hills, Calif.

The bill review process could result in a maximum of 287 days before a final determination, he said.

--By Anne Freedman

February 19, 2013

Copyright 2013© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.