Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

COUNTERPOINT: Risk Transfer Can Never Be a Commodity

Businesses need to align risk management with different goals, so risk transfer can never be a commodity.

By DAN REYNOLDS, managing editor of Risk & Insurance®


That's why products such as business interruption coverage, or property coverage are so often the same in name only. Ask to look at the sales and loss experience of Company A and it will vary greatly from that of Company B. Business interruption policies for the two companies could never be the same and still fulfill the needs of each buyer.

The engineering of the buildings owned by Company A won't be the same as those for Company B. The wind storm exposure pattern for Company A will vary from that of Company B. That's where brokers and risk managers make all the difference.

It's the narrative that matters, the story told to the underwriter and the data to support it. Only people deliver that value, not commodities. In the insurance market, no commodity will ever replace that value.

The claims side is just as complex, and varied. The forensics of claim experience, how one company manages risk and how that impacts its claim experience, varies greatly from company to company. As with so many things in business, it's the relationships that really matter.

The claims handling experience of a company that has clear lines of communication and good relationships with its brokers and underwriters will tend to be better than that where the relationships are not as well maintained. Where litigation enters the picture, isn't it a case where those relationships might not have been as well maintained as they should have been? What about that smacks of a commodity-like approach?

A second reason that insurance can never be a commodity is that insurance regulation is different in 50 states. In workers' compensation, one state's approach to pharmacy regulation will vary greatly from that of another. The exposure is simply not the same. So how could the price or the product ever be?

Data, the mastery of recording it and effectively using it to make risk management decisions, will eventually soften these edges somewhat.

But business itself will continue to innovate and as it innovates and creates new markets, insurance and risk transfer will have to sprout wings and follow. Perhaps risk management that is unthinkingly practiced resembles the purchase of a commodity.

But risk management is far more demanding and complex than that. It requires the skills of a mathematician and a storyteller and no commodity can do that.


Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints
-- --

February 19, 2013

Copyright 2013© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.