Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Small Brokers Scared of Getting Whacked

Mom-and-pop shops fear large carriers will use the Spitzer investigation to scrimp on commissions and raise service charges.

By Steve Yahn

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Independent insurance brokers across the country are bracing for what they see as an inevitable--and financially damaging--consequence of New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's crusade against the industry: lower commissions from the larger insurers they do business with.

Plus, for small agencies, the slew of Spitzer-inspired actions against larger insurers couldn't have come at a worse time. For this is the season in which insurers traditionally calculate the yearend "bonuses" they pay the smaller agencies that feed them business. (These bonuses from insurers are usually based on the surplus remaining after premium revenue for the year generated by the small broker, minus premium income losses.)

"It looks like we're going to get a double hit from the insurers we work with," said one of the principals of a midsize, family-owned property-and-casualty agency in the Northeast that deals with 15 or so insurers.

"You can count on insurers to use Spitzer as an excuse to pay mom-and-pop agencies like ours less commission," said this owner. "They'll do anything to protect their bottom line."

As for the traditional yearend performance bonus, he said, "They (the insurers) nickel-and -dime us every year, anyway. Now who knows what's going to happen."

There's another revenue-generating front insurers are likely to become more aggressive about--and an area they've already pushed relentlessly on in the past three or four years: that is to continue to pile on service charges, says this broker, who runs a property-and-casualty agency with his wife and her father.

"Most policyholders, businesses as well as individuals, often don't scrutinize the bills they receive from their insurance company," said the broker. "But if they had been examining their bills closely, they would have noticed all sorts of exorbitantly high service charges."

For example, he said, "If people are on a monthly payment plan and they don't pay on time, they (the insurance company) can whack you with a late charge as much as $20 to $25." A more insidious practice that most consumers don't know about until it's too late, he added, is one in which any service fees on a payment are deducted from the payment before applying a check to the amount due. This can sometimes cause a violation of the insurance policy and lead to a messy cancellation situation that takes time and additional money to restore.

A DEATH FORETOLD?

Why have these practices escalated only in the past three or four years?

"Remember that most of the largest insurers have financial operations far outside just strictly insurance," the agency principal said. "Reaching for ever-higher profits has made them greedy, in an almost desperate way, which is dangerous for us and our clients. Unfortunately, we cannot control these extra cost burdens that our clients have to deal with."

Of course for the small agencies, and even larger insurers with which they do business, there are several other disquieting fears stirred by Eliot Spitzer's oft-quoted statement that in light of illegal activities at Marsh & McLennan, Zurich American and numerous other giant brokerages and insurers, the industry is likely to need an entirely new model for conducting business.

"More and more, people are going to be asking, 'Do you really need a middleman?" noted an attorney who is very familiar with insurance companies under investigation by Spitzer and other law enforcement agencies and insurance regulators. "People are bound to look more closely at companies like GEICO that sell policies directly through their own sales staff."

Also, this attorney underscored, "there are hundreds and hundreds of insurance options available directly via the Internet. It's staggering to see how many insurance possibilities have opened up on the Internet in just the past few years."

(An Internet search under "insurance brokers" brought 6,180,000 responses; an "insurance quotes" search elicited 17.3 million responses. Most major insurers, of course, have an extensive and sophisticated presence on the Internet in this important competitive arena.)

"The long-standing role of the middleman will not whither away," this attorney also said. "But it does mean they're going to have to bring more to the table than ever before. Large companies will always need expert advice from middlemen of various sorts, but the service must be comprehensive and honest.

Then, too, there will always be the need for insurance advisers who are experts on specialized forms of insurance. Overall, the key to successful insuring in the future will be to serve a client's best interest as never before."

STEVE YAHN lives in Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y.

January 1, 2005

Copyright 2005© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.