Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Appeals Court Upholds Anti-Fraud Rules

'Doc-in-a-box' clinics get clocked. Decision seen as a victory for insurers.

By Cyril Tuohy

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

In a decision considered a victory for New York's anti-fraud regulations, bogus incorporated medical practices are not entitled to reimbursement under a no-fault policy assigned to a patient, a New York appeals court has ruled.

In the case, State Farm v. Malleta, the insurer successfully argued that anti-fraud regulation enacted in 2003 renders a fraudulent health care provider ineligible for no-fault reimbursement.

"The impact on the industry at large is going to be significant," said Francis J. Serbaroli, an attorney with Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case. "There will be a carryover from the no-fault arena to the health-care arena."

State Farm sued, declaring that it need not reimburse defendants--fraudulently incorporated medical corporations--for assigned claims submitted under no-fault insurance policies.

According to the insurer, nonphysicians paid doctors to use their names on paperwork filed with state authorities to establish doctor's offices. Once established, the nonphysicians forced the doctors to hire management companies owned by the nonphysicians.

The management companies inflated the medical bills and sent them to insurance companies for reimbursement. Profits ended up in the pockets of the nonphysicians.

State Farm denied the claim on the basis of anti-fraud regulations passed by New York insurance regulators. Defendants argued that they were entitled to reimbursement, even though they were fraudulently licensed.

State property-casualty insurance lobbies were pleased with the the court's decision. "Illegal 'doc-in-a-box' medical clinics secretly set up by nonphysicians to charge insurance companies inflated rates add to the cost of auto insurance in New York," said Bernard Bourdeau, president of the New York Insurance Association.

Frank Sztuk, chairman of the New York Alliance Against Insurance Fraud, called the decision "a significant weapon in the fight against fraud and abuse in New York's no-fault insurance system."

Serbaroli also said that while this latest decision applies to New York state law and federal cases which rely on New York law, it will also serve to boostgood quality health care for people involved in auto accidents. Some nonphysicians managed as many as 20 or 30 companies, and the dollar amount involved in fraudulent billing reached into the tens of millions, he said.

May 1, 2005

Copyright 2005© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.