Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Their Risks Are Your Risks

As employers continue to confront the bottom-line impact of the cost of their employee benefits and employees struggle to prepare for more expensive retirement needs, they are both discovering that their interests may be inexorably linked. Neither side of the labor balance may have enough money to manage their respective retirement risks successfully.

By Len Strazewski

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

In mid-April, General Motors Corp. stunned Wall Street by announcing its worst first-quarter financial report in 13 years, a loss of $1.1 billion, compared with a profit of $1.3 billion for the same period last year.

While most of the losses were attributable to the struggling automotive operations, the company also blamed rising health care costs for present employees and retirees. Retiree costs are particularly controversial as they have been a component of ongoing problems between GM and its retirees for a long time. Only six months before the recent earnings announcement, the company announced a plan to require retirees to contribute more to medical costs as a way of offsetting more than $6 billion in retiree medical costs in 2004.

The management initiative led to widespread complaints from retirees and national coverage of the retirees' fears that the decision was the first step in stripping many of their promised benefits.

While explaining the earnings report to analysts, GM executives confirmed that one way to offset the losses would be to tap a $20 billion reserve the company set aside for retiree medical costs in 1997.

While they did not cite pension plan costs this time, GM's bad quarter also follows last year's announcement of general pension obligations of more than $100 billion.

While GM, its employees and retirees may have the largest and most obvious problems meeting their respective needs, they are certainly not alone. Employee benefits experts and the most recent research confirm a national problem.

James Klein, president of the American Benefits Council in Washington testified before the Senate Special Committee on Aging in April, describing the role of employer-sponsored retirement plans in increasing national savings for retirement.

"Retirement savings through employer-sponsored plans is the one bright light in an overall dismal picture of how Americans save," he said.

He also noted that the retirement problem was not limited to pensions. "One of the greatest challenges to the retirement income security is the continued rising cost of health care coverage which absorbs available resources for employers, workers and retirees."

CONCERNS CONFIRMED

A new survey of 200 corporate financial executives by Hewitt Associates in Lincolnshire, Ill. confirms the widespread concern.

Sixty-five percent of respondents said their top priority for the next two years will be to identify ways to control the growth in retirement costs and almost half said they would focus on reducing pension cost volatility.

Fifty-nine percent said they plan to step up efforts to educate their employees about the need to save for retirement. Only 30 percent of financial executives said they are confident their workers will retire with sufficient retirement assets, yet more than 70 percent said they believe their employees' ability to retire is connected to their organization's ability to manage its workforce effectively.

Whether they like it or not, employers, employees and retirees have much in common, notably, insufficient resources for the future.

LEN STRAZEWSKI, a professor and benefits expert, is the benefits columnist for Risk & Insurance®.

June 1, 2005

Copyright 2005© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.