Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Ratings vs. Reality

Fitch downgraded its outlook on Berkshire Hathaway earlier this year to negative, despite the company having $40 billion in cash. Yup, $40 billion. Fitch cited the auteur theory of insurance: because Warren Buffett is an older man, it's negativity from here on out. Buffett didn't turn 75 or 100 or any round age; it just sort of came up after Hank Greenberg left AIG a little rudderless in the short term.

By Roger Crombie

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

At first, the ratings actions against Berkshire Hathaway just seemed laughable. If you've got $40 billion of spare cash lying around, how bad can things look? If this keeps up and Buffett reaches 100 at the helm, Berkshire Hathaway will become a strange animal indeed. By then, it will have a trillion dollars in cash and a rating of F.

"Although the 74-year-old Mr. Buffett is reportedly in good health and has expressed no intention if retiring," Fitch said, the future is grim since the second-greatest Buffett in history (the first being

Jimmy, since you ask) cannot easily be replaced.

Now, I've got a word for my friends at the ratings agencies. If Buffett is punished for being 74, why aren't other chief executive officers similarly rated? I know some who fly all the time, despite the odds. I saw a CEO jump into a fish tank in a public aquarium once, for charity. He could have drowned. Every CEO, I'd guess, is stressed beyond the max. It's a dangerous occupation. So why not downgrades all around? Oh, I forgot. We don't get those until the third quarter.

Buffett's no fool, as the numbers show. He has one of the best track records since track records were invented. He's the Sage of Omaha, for goodness' sake, and they don't come any sager. Does anyone imagine that Buffett hasn't given this some thought? They must think his plan is: Well, when I get fed up with this, or whatever, I'll just go home and the hell with all of them. Let them blow it all on the good life in Omaha's ritzy nightclub district. See if I care.

BUFFETT HAS A PLAN

No. Buffett owns shares, lots of shares in Berkshire Hathaway, so he's going to want them to do as well as is humanly possible after he's gone.

He has a plan all right. Maybe he just forgot to tell the agencies. Or maybe he's still as sharp as a whip and no older at 74 than some people are at 54, and has no plan beyond having his stooges hire whoever is the next sagest guy in the world on the day he hangs up his eyeshade.

Whatever the case, the downgrade sounds like the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. If the guy with $40 billion in cash doesn't have a positive outlook, who does? Mice, who have never made a loss and have no debt? My parents' dining table, around for 60 years and never turned down a claim?

Each Berkshire Hathaway share already costs more than minimum wage for a week. Few countries, if any, have ever run a $40 billion surplus. Buffett's got $40 billion he's not using and his outlook's negative. The rest of us have a buck or two; our outlook must be worse than catastrophic.

We live in a world of infinite disappointment, a harsh and cold environment in which winning is everything. Buffett wins. It's over. Everyone go home and think of something else to do.

ROGER CROMBIE, a writer, editor and former accountant, is a regular columnist for Risk & Insurance®. He also covers issues on alternative risk for this magazine.

July 1, 2005

Copyright 2005© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.