Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Report: Emergency Preparedness Lacking in Many States

Federal cuts to emergency preparedness funding could have dire health and financial effects, warns a nonprofit.

By Dan Reynolds

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Too much of the country remains vulnerable to the effects of a bioterrorism attack and other health emergencies, according to a report put out by a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit.

For example, six years after the terrorist destruction of New York's World Trade Center, 21 states do not have adequate legal liability protections in place for emergency workers. The findings were released by the Trust for America's Health, a group that works to better health conditions nationally.

But residents and business owners in eight states can rest assured that their home states are leading the pack when it comes to meeting 10 indicators for emergency health preparedness.

Illinois, Nebraska, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, Kentucky and Hawaii are the states that meet all 10 of the nonprofit's key standards for health emergency preparedness.

Examples of those indicators include adequate planning to distribute emergency vaccines; sufficient labs to test biological threats; conducting annual emergency preparedness exercises with the National Guard; and increasing or maintaining funds for public health in 2005-2006 and 2006-2007.

The good news is that the majority of states showed improvement over 2005 in meeting the nonprofit's standards. The bad news is that six states managed to achieve only six out of 10 of the nonprofit's goals.

Underwriters of liability policies in Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Nevada, Wisconsin and Wyoming should be on notice that those states lag the rest of the country in health emergency preparedness, according to the nonprofit.

Jeff Levi, the executive director of TFAH, also decried continued funding cuts to federal investing in state and federal preparedness programs.

"These efforts may seem penny-wise now, but could prove pound-foolish later," Levi warned.

March 1, 2008

Copyright 2008© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.