Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Is a Lucrative Legal Franchise Under Assault?



By Dan Reynolds

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

A specialist in electronic discovery says he's not surprised insurance carriers and brokers would take the step of trying to provide e-discovery services on their own to cut costs for themselves and their clients.

But whether they will be a force in the marketplace is another matter.

"In the past what I have seen is that insurers have been a little ahead of the wave in terms of addressing and dealing with the cost of e-discovery because, obviously, in some instances they are covering that for their insured," says Jonathan Sablone, a partner in the Boston office of Nixon Peabody.

"What they have been very aggressive in doing, along with lots of other corporations and law firms, including mine, is going out there and trying to get essentially bulk discounts: preferred relationships and other pricing concessions from many of the vendors that are out there," he says.

But so far, Sablone says he has not seen a big impact in the e-discovery marketplace from the services that the insurance companies have invested so much in offering.

"I would say so far that the impact of that decision to go out there and do it themselves has not made a giant splash in terms of competition in the area."

One reason for that may be because of the sheer size of the market for e-discovery services.

"The marketplace is so broad that you have to be very careful about looking at the various players and what they do," says Sablone.

"I mean, there are consulting firms that do exactly that, they just give consulting. There are vendors out there that provide hosting services and production services and conversion services," he continues.

"There are law firms that give legal advice and that assist in large national cases that involve electronically stored information or ESI. And then there are law firms and consulting groups and others that try to do it all to some extent," he adds.

Sablone also says insurers are a part of that service mix but aren't making a ripple yet as a service provider

But the lines between what kinds of services the different sectors of the e-discovery market provide are becoming blurred.

"The vendors, their core competency may be processing and hosting of data, but you'll see them out there doing consulting too," he says.

"You'll see consulting firms, that's what they do well, but now they're getting involved in the hosting game because they think that's profitable. You'll see law firms, obviously, we give legal advice, we're out there doing a little of this ourselves as well, and I suspect you're starting to see the same with the insurers," he says.

May 1, 2008

Copyright 2008© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.